This report presents findings from an evaluation of section 1115 demonstrations in six states—Arkansas, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Montana, and New Hampshire—that tested new approaches to administering Medicaid for low-income adults during the period 2014 - 2017.
Related Content
Related Publications for Sandra Chao
-
Section 1115 Alternative Medicaid Expansions: Summative Evaluation ReportJan 17, 2020
-
Medicaid Emergency Psychiatric Demonstration: Response to 21st Century Cures Act Requirements (Report to Congress)Sep 30, 2019
Since the enactment of the Medicaid statute in 1965, payment for services for beneficiaries ages 21 to 64 who are patients in institutions for mental diseases (IMDs) has been prohibited; this is known as the IMD exclusion.
-
What’s Driving High Disenrollment in Medicare Advantage?Apr 15, 2019
Disenrollment rates are one way that policy makers assess the performance of Medicare Advantage (MA) health plans.
-
Targeting High-Need Beneficiaries in Medicare Advantage: Opportunities to Address Medical and Social NeedsFeb 11, 2019
Serving Medicare beneficiaries with complex health care needs requires understanding both the medical and social factors that may affect their health.
-
Implementing Electronic Health Record Default Settings to Reduce Opioid Overprescribing: A Pilot StudyJan 01, 2019
The authors implemented a 15-pill electronic health record default for new Schedule II opioids and assessed opioid quantity before and after implementation using electronic health record data on 6,390 opioid prescriptions from 448 prescribers.
-
Best Practices in Causal Inference for Evaluations of Section 1115 Eligibility and Coverage DemonstrationsJun 30, 2018
This guide, which uses examples from recent reforms for adult Medicaid beneficiaries, is intended to support demonstration states by describing best practices in causal inference.
-
Continuing with the Same Issuer in Transitions Between Medicaid and the Marketplace: Premium Assistance Models in Arkansas, Iowa, and New HampshireJan 02, 2018
Many low-income adults experience fluctuations in income and household composition that affect their eligibility for Medicaid versus Marketplace subsidies, causing churning between public and private coverage.